Ched Myers, Binding the Strong Man, comments on the withered fig tree incident like this:
The curse/exorcism of the fig tree/temple is more than a political protest; Mark means for it to be a “proleptic” sign
within his own narrative. When Jesus later speaks of the end of the temple state in his second sermon, Mark will point us back to this action, through the use of the expression “Look!” (ide):
11:21: Rabbi, Look! The fig tree you cursed has withered!”
13:3: “Teacher, Look! What wonderful stones and buildings!”The direct narrative connection between the disciples’ encounter with the tree and the temple is a kind of inverse discourse… The reader must choose which reality to believe in: the temple-as-withered-to-the-root (sign of a system that is coming to an end) or the temple-as-bigger-than-life (sign of a system that will never end…)…. This is the reason why in 11:21 Peter “remembers”… the symbolic action; Mark hopes his readers will also “remember” it in their historical discernment. (304)
The contrast between the two realities in which you might choose to believe is what strikes me. So much of the biblical narrative is an invitation to see the world differently, to recognize that the world as we can see it with our eyes is often not reflecting the story (especially the eschatology) that God has in store.
Our calling is to be transformed by the renewing of our minds; or, as Richard B. Hays says, to undergo a conversion of the imagination so that we can see that the glory of God is not always reflected in the glorious works of people. This is especially true, as Myers highlights, when that worldly glory is built on systems of injustice and oppression.
“This is especially true, as Myers highlights, when that worldly glory is built on systems of injustice and oppression.”
yep. But when is it not?
I have that lingering question, raised in last week’s posts, about the glory of the nations that God is pleased to receive as an offering to himself. Somehow, the things that are not seen are more important than the things that are; and yet, the fullness of the earth is God’s glory, inasmuch as it is a response to his own command and blessing to fill the earth. That’s the tension I’m trying to navigate with the “especially true” comment.